Health Policy & Advocacy
Resources
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest News
Brand-Name Rx Rise After Docs Get Drug Company Perks: StudyAs Prices Rise for Parkinson's, Alzheimer's Meds, Patients Go WithoutRoll Up Your Sleeve and Donate Blood for Cancer PatientsShotguns Often Play Tragic Role in Rural Teens' Suicides: StudyPrice Hikes Have Patients Turning to Craigslist for Insulin, Asthma InhalersConsumers Waste Twice as Much Food as Experts ThoughtStricter Clean Air Laws Could Save Thousands of Lives a Year: StudyCaregivers Give Short Shrift to Their Own HealthMedicare Could Save Billions If Allowed to Negotiate Insulin PricesDentists Among Top Prescribers of OpioidsBedside 'Sitters' May Not Prevent Hospital FallsDoes Race Play a Part in ICU Outcomes?When Pharmacists Allowed to Give Anti-Opioid Med Without Rx, Access SoarsNew Study Supports Lowering Age of First ColonoscopyAgeism Affects People Around the GlobeLife Expectancy in U.S. Increases for First Time in 4 YearsJust 1% of Doctors Prescribe Nearly Half of Opioids in U.S.AHA News: These Doctors Want to Write 'Farmacy' PrescriptionsCan Online Reviews Help Health Inspectors Keep Tabs on Restaurants?AHA News: Can Social Media Be Good for Your Health?Flame Retardants, Pesticides Remain Threat to U.S. Health: StudySimple Tweak to Hospital Computer Program Cuts Opioid PrescriptionsJust 2% of Patients Who Need It Get Anti-Opioid Drug NaloxoneAre Doctors Discarding 'Injured' Kidneys That Might Be Used for Transplant?Probiotics: Don't Buy the Online HypeNew Drugs Getting FDA's Blessing Faster, but Is That a Good Thing?Would Tighter Swimming Rules at Public Beaches, Lakes and Rivers Save Lives?Seniors Still Wary of Online Reviews When Picking DoctorsMany Drugstores Misinform on Disposal of Unused MedsAHA News: Get Started on the Path to Better Health in the New YearAHA News: Bystander CPR Less Common in Hispanic NeighborhoodsPrepared Bystanders Save Lives When Cardiac Arrest StrikesVaccinations Rose After California Curbed ExemptionsSpecial 'Invisible' Dye Could Serve as Skin's Vaccination RecordGrowing Obesity Rates May Contribute to Climate ChangeHealth Tip: Do's and Don'ts While Waiting for an AmbulanceFDA to Allow States to Import Prescription Drugs From Other CountriesWhere Pot Is Legal, People Are Likely to Believe Its BenefitsFewer Americans Have a Primary Care Doctor NowHospital-Level Care in Your Home? It Could Be the FutureSleepy Nurses Could Put Patients at RiskTighter Alcohol Laws Might Help Curb CancerMany Young Adults Misusing Medical Marijuana, Study SuggestsAnother Possible Effect of Climate Change: More Preemie Babies1 in 18 U.S. Teens Carries a Gun to School: StudyU.S. Poison Centers Field More Calls About Psychoactive Substances: StudyDoctors' Group Calls for Ban on Most Vaping ProductsAs Disease Outbreaks Tied to 'Anti-Vaxxers' Rise, States Take ActionAHA News: Millions Who Never Smoked Cigarettes Are Using Other Tobacco ProductsMost Docs Don't Know Hair Care Is a Barrier to Exercise for Black Women
Questions and AnswersVideosLinksBook Reviews
Related Topics

Health Insurance
Healthcare

Routine Screening for Pancreatic Cancer Not Warranted, Expert Panel Says

HealthDay News
by -- Steven Reinberg
Updated: Aug 6th 2019

new article illustration

TUESDAY, Aug. 6, 2019 (HealthDay News) -- There's nothing to be gained by screening for pancreatic cancer in people with no signs or symptoms of the lethal tumor, according to an influential U.S. panel of experts.

Looking over the accumulated data on the subject, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) on Tuesday reaffirmed its prior recommendation against routine screening for pancreatic cancer.

The USPSTF is an independent, volunteer panel of national experts in prevention and evidence-based medicine.

"Pancreatic cancer is an uncommon, but devastating disease with low survival rates, even in those detected at early stages," task force member Dr. Chyke Doubeni, noted in a USPSTF statement.

However, "at the present time, screening for pancreatic cancer in people without any signs or symptoms would cause more harm than good and therefore should not be done," he added.

According to the USPSTF, there's no evidence that screening for pancreatic cancer improves patient outcomes. In addition, some screening tests are invasive and can be painful and possibly inaccurate. They can also damage the pancreas.

If cancer is found, surgery to remove the organ can result in significant bleeding, long recovery and possibly death, the task force also noted.

The trouble is that tumors of the pancreas are often discovered late, making the cancer a "silent killer." According to the American Cancer Society, about 57,000 Americans will be diagnosed with the disease in 2019, and almost 46,000 people will die from the illness.

Better screens are needed for early detection.

Task force member Dr. Chien-Wen Tseng said in the statement that "clinicians need to be able to find pancreatic cancer earlier in its development, when it is more treatable. The task force is calling for more research on effective and accurate screening tests that can detect pancreatic cancer earlier and that lead to fewer harms."

According to Dr. Sanjay Reddy, a cancer expert unconnected to the USPSTF, "The role of 'biomarkers,' or some sort of chemical blood test has the most promise in terms of early detection." Reddy is assistant professor of surgical oncology at Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia.

"However," he added, "to date, we still have no good way to test this -- the future of early detection remains our best option for screening not only high-risk patients, but all patients."

The panel stressed that screening for pancreatic cancer may still be warranted for people deemed to be at high risk for the disease.

More information

For more on pancreatic cancer, head to the American Cancer Society.




Facebook

Amazon Smile

 

Children and Adult services are available now with no wait time.  

Please contact HBH at 860-548-0101, option 2.

 


powered by centersite dot net