Health Policy & Advocacy
Resources
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest News
Brand-Name Rx Rise After Docs Get Drug Company Perks: StudyAs Prices Rise for Parkinson's, Alzheimer's Meds, Patients Go WithoutRoll Up Your Sleeve and Donate Blood for Cancer PatientsShotguns Often Play Tragic Role in Rural Teens' Suicides: StudyPrice Hikes Have Patients Turning to Craigslist for Insulin, Asthma InhalersConsumers Waste Twice as Much Food as Experts ThoughtStricter Clean Air Laws Could Save Thousands of Lives a Year: StudyCaregivers Give Short Shrift to Their Own HealthMedicare Could Save Billions If Allowed to Negotiate Insulin PricesDentists Among Top Prescribers of OpioidsBedside 'Sitters' May Not Prevent Hospital FallsDoes Race Play a Part in ICU Outcomes?When Pharmacists Allowed to Give Anti-Opioid Med Without Rx, Access SoarsNew Study Supports Lowering Age of First ColonoscopyAgeism Affects People Around the GlobeLife Expectancy in U.S. Increases for First Time in 4 YearsJust 1% of Doctors Prescribe Nearly Half of Opioids in U.S.AHA News: These Doctors Want to Write 'Farmacy' PrescriptionsCan Online Reviews Help Health Inspectors Keep Tabs on Restaurants?AHA News: Can Social Media Be Good for Your Health?Flame Retardants, Pesticides Remain Threat to U.S. Health: StudySimple Tweak to Hospital Computer Program Cuts Opioid PrescriptionsJust 2% of Patients Who Need It Get Anti-Opioid Drug NaloxoneAre Doctors Discarding 'Injured' Kidneys That Might Be Used for Transplant?Probiotics: Don't Buy the Online HypeNew Drugs Getting FDA's Blessing Faster, but Is That a Good Thing?Would Tighter Swimming Rules at Public Beaches, Lakes and Rivers Save Lives?Seniors Still Wary of Online Reviews When Picking DoctorsMany Drugstores Misinform on Disposal of Unused MedsAHA News: Get Started on the Path to Better Health in the New YearAHA News: Bystander CPR Less Common in Hispanic NeighborhoodsPrepared Bystanders Save Lives When Cardiac Arrest StrikesVaccinations Rose After California Curbed ExemptionsSpecial 'Invisible' Dye Could Serve as Skin's Vaccination RecordGrowing Obesity Rates May Contribute to Climate ChangeHealth Tip: Do's and Don'ts While Waiting for an AmbulanceFDA to Allow States to Import Prescription Drugs From Other CountriesWhere Pot Is Legal, People Are Likely to Believe Its BenefitsFewer Americans Have a Primary Care Doctor NowHospital-Level Care in Your Home? It Could Be the FutureSleepy Nurses Could Put Patients at RiskTighter Alcohol Laws Might Help Curb CancerMany Young Adults Misusing Medical Marijuana, Study SuggestsAnother Possible Effect of Climate Change: More Preemie Babies1 in 18 U.S. Teens Carries a Gun to School: StudyU.S. Poison Centers Field More Calls About Psychoactive Substances: StudyDoctors' Group Calls for Ban on Most Vaping ProductsAs Disease Outbreaks Tied to 'Anti-Vaxxers' Rise, States Take ActionAHA News: Millions Who Never Smoked Cigarettes Are Using Other Tobacco ProductsMost Docs Don't Know Hair Care Is a Barrier to Exercise for Black Women
Questions and AnswersVideosLinksBook Reviews
Related Topics

Health Insurance
Healthcare

Americans' Trust in Scientists Follows a Sharp Political Divide

HealthDay News
by -- Robert Preidt
Updated: Aug 9th 2019

new article illustration

FRIDAY, Aug. 9, 2019 (HealthDay News) -- Americans' confidence in scientists is on the rise, but deep political divisions persist, a new nationwide poll reveals.

The Pew Research Center poll of more than 4,400 adults found that 86% have at least "a fair amount" of confidence in scientists to act in the public interest. That includes 35% who said they have "a great deal" of confidence, up from 21% in 2016.

Sixty percent of respondents also said scientists should play an active role in policy debates about scientific issues.

The results suggest Americans' confidence in scientists is similar to confidence in the military but higher than for the media, business leaders and elected officials, according to Pew.

The findings exposed significant political fault lines surrounding the role of scientists in policy debates.

Democrats (43%) were more likely than Republicans (27%) to have a great deal of confidence in scientists. Seventy-three percent of Democrats said scientists should play an active role in policy debates, while 56% of Republicans said scientists should establish solid facts and then stay out of the wrangling.

While 54% of Democrats said scientists are generally better than others at making decisions about scientific policy, 66% of Republicans said scientists' decisions are the same as or worse than other people's.

Perception of bias also differed. Sixty-two percent of Democrats said scientists base their judgments solely on facts, while 55% of Republicans said scientists are just as likely to be biased as other people.

The poll focused on scientists in three fields (medicine, nutrition and the environment) and six specialties. Those specialties included medical research, medical doctors, nutrition researchers, dietitians, environmental research scientists and environmental health specialists.

The more familiar respondents were with scientists' work, the more positive and trusting they were toward it, the poll found.

But many are skeptical about scientists' integrity. Less than 20% said they think specialists are usually or always transparent about potential conflicts of interest.

And the poll found that blacks and Hispanics were more likely than whites to say research misconduct is a "very big" or "moderately big" problem.

The nationwide poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 1.9 percentage points.

More information

The Pew Research Center has more on public trust in scientists.




Facebook

Amazon Smile

 

Children and Adult services are available now with no wait time.  

Please contact HBH at 860-548-0101, option 2.

 


powered by centersite dot net