Health Policy & Advocacy
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest News
Nursing Home Staff Closest to Patients Are Least Likely to Get COVID VaccinesLowering Medicare Age Could Help Close Racial Gaps in Health Care: StudyHow Trust in Science Can Make You Vulnerable to 'Pseudoscience'Major Medical Groups Call for Mandatory COVID Vaccination for Health WorkersU.S. to Stick With International Travel RestrictionsPatients of Color Less Likely to Get Specialist Care Than White PatientsEven at Same Hospital, Black Patients Face More Complications Than WhitesMany Patients Billed for Preventive Care That Should Be Free: StudyDrug Makers Reach $26 Billion Deal on Opioid LawsuitsCOVID Drove Biggest Drop in U.S. Life Expectancy Since World War IIU.S. Issues Toughest Travel Alert for Britain As COVID Cases There ClimbLong Distance to Care Can Mean Worse Outcomes for Young Cancer PatientsCanada May Open Borders to Fully Vaccinated Americans by Mid-AugustWhy Many Black & Hispanic Americans Distrust COVID Vaccines$345 Million Settlement Proposed in EpiPen LawsuitsAHA News: How Healthy Is Your Neighborhood? Where You Live Can Greatly Affect Heart, Brain HealthExtreme Heat Hits Poorer Neighborhoods HarderFive Neutrogena and Aveeno Spray Sunscreens Recalled Due to BenzeneMany States Move to Ban Vaccine Mandates, Passports in Public SchoolsWHO Calls for Global Registry of Human Genome EditingMost Cancer Screenings Make Big Rebound After Pandemic DeclineBlack Churches Could Be Key to Boosting Vaccination RatesFDA Head Asks for Investigation Into Alzheimer's Drug ApprovalWhy Even the Healthy Need a Primary Care DoctorClimate Change Already Causes 5 Million Extra Deaths Per YearIs Medicare Overspending? Costco Prices Much Less for Generic DrugsLanguage Barriers Keep 25 million in U.S. From Good Health CareState Lotteries Don't Boost COVID Vaccination Numbers: StudyBlood Shortages Causing Surgery Delays Across U.S.Walmart to Offer Low-Priced InsulinCould Home Test for Colon Cancer Mean a Big Medical Bill to Come?Juul to Pay $40 Million in N.C. Case Over Vaping's Harm to TeensHospitals: One Reason COVID Is More Lethal for Black AmericansU.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Challenge to Affordable Care ActHow Secure Is Your Health or Fitness App?Doctors May Be Overprescribing Opioids After SurgeriesMost Editors at Leading Medical Journals Are White, Study FindsAHA News: Why Everyone Should Care About Health Disparities – And What to Do About ThemUS to Send 500 Million COVID Vaccine Doses to Countries Desperate for ShotsThink You Can Skip That Annual Physical?  Think AgainYour Doctor Appointments Might Look Different Post-PandemicU.S. Blood Supply Is Safe From Coronavirus, Study FindsThink You Can Spot Fake News? Many Can'tTelehealth Is Growing in Use, Acceptance Among Americans: PollAHA News: Deep Disparities Persist in Who Gets Exposed to Secondhand SmokeMany Pre-Surgery Tests Are Useless, So Why Are Hospitals Still Using Them?U.S. Officials Say 50% of American Adults Are Now Fully VaccinatedMore Pot-Linked Poisoning Cases as Edibles' Popularity BoomsU.S. Issues Tough Travel Warnings for Japan Ahead of OlympicsScience Studies Most Likely to Be Wrong Are the Most Widely Read
Questions and AnswersVideosLinksBook Reviews
Related Topics

Health Insurance

U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Challenge to Affordable Care Act

HealthDay News
by Ernie Mundell
Updated: Jun 17th 2021

new article illustration

THURSDAY, June 17, 2021 (HealthDay News) -- The landmark Affordable Care Act, which has expanded health care coverage to tens of millions of Americans, has withstood a third challenge before the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a 7-2 decision, a majority of justices ruled on Thursday that plaintiffs involved in the case did not sustain any injury that gave them standing to sue, The New York Times reported.

The decision left unresolved a larger issue, namely whether the Obama-era law could continue without a provision that initially mandated that Americans obtain insurance or pay penalty.

Had the court acted to strike down "Obamacare," about 21 million people who gained insurance coverage under the plan would have become uninsured, according to recent estimates from the Urban Institute, the Times said.

The American Medical Association (AMA) applauded the ruling.

"Today's decision by the U.S. Supreme Court is a victory for patients and for the gains in health care coverage achieved through the Affordable Care Act (ACA)," AMA President Dr. Gerald Harmon said in a statement.

"With yet another court decision upholding the ACA now behind us, we remain committed to strengthening the current law and look forward to policymakers advancing solutions to improve the ACA," Harmon added. "The AMA will continue working to expand access to health care and ensure that all Americans have meaningful, comprehensive, and affordable health coverage to improve the health of the nation"

The latest Supreme Court decision marks the third time the Supreme Court has ruled on challenges to the ACA: It struck down two prior challenges brought in 2012 and 2015. Numerous attempts by Republicans in Congress to repeal the legislation have also failed.

Repealing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) would disproportionately affect the health coverage of low-income adults, who benefited most from the expansion of Medicaid implemented by the law. Million of young adults under the age of 26 would also have lost insurance coverage, because Obamacare allows them to be covered by their parent's plans. Low-income families can also get assistance in paying for private insurance premiums under the law's provisions.

Protection under the ACA also helped shield the millions of Americans with current or past health issues, because it mandates that insurers cannot deny coverage based on preexisting conditions.

The case deliberated this time by the nine justices on the court was California vs. Texas, No. 19-840. According to the Times, the case was brought forward by Republican officials. They claimed that the ACA mandate requiring coverage became unconstitutional following Congressional action in 2017 to eliminate the penalty for failing to get coverage. According to the plaintiffs, the mandate could therefore no longer be justified as a tax.

That argument was based on a 5-4 SCOTUS ruling in 2012, which found that the mandate was authorized by Congress' power to assess taxes.

Based on that argument, the new challenge had made its way successfully through lower courts. But the high court found that no injury to the plaintiffs was incurred in eliminating the mandate and ruled against the latest challenge.

More information

Find out more about the Affordable Care Act at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

SOURCE: The New York Times; American Medical Association, news release, June 17, 2021


Amazon Smile


Children and Adult services are available now with no wait time.  

Please contact HBH at 860-548-0101, option 2.


powered by centersite dot net